Great article. So sad, that so many people are falling for this.
The ruling class have played a blinder once again.
I think most objective 'conspiracy theorists' would agree that the ruling can engineer and exploit immigration for economic reasons and to create new opportunities for divide-and-conquer operations.
However, I have never been given a logical reason as to why the ruling class would show preference for slaves of a particular ethnicity or religion. Furthermore, they revealed their intention of wanting to change the very essence of what it is to be human through their twisted Transhumanist ideology. Is there any evidence to suggest that a Syrian would be a better candidate than a Scotsman, or have superior substance, for this inorganic redesign?
Various quotes and writings through the years suggest that the parasite class see us all as farm animals or Untermensch.
Is European/American/British culture under attack? Yes. Is this attack confined to White Christians? No. Technocracy will affect aspect of our lives from our person-to-person interactions, consumption habits, our relationship with the natural world and therefore will ‘re-image’ all culture if these Sickos are successful.
in the last decade, Trudeau added 10 million immigrants into a country of 30 million. The Great Replacement is a daily, on the ground reality that no amount of gaslighting, be it ever so verbose, can change.
I'm in England so can't comment on Canada, but I don't regard recent Polish immigration as part of the policy of population replacement, because they're so easily assimilated. We already knew this from our experience of the Poles who decided to remain in the UK after WW2. That just left us with people whose surnames were hard to spell and pronounce but who were otherwise pretty much indistinguishable from the indigenous population.
What do you mean by "the nature of the whites"? Am I to infer from your opening remark that you prefer immigration to be white but there are some types of white that you don't regard as desirable? I wasn't aware that there was a massive Roma immigration issue, so it seems a strange one to throw in. Do you consider Roma people to be white? (I don't think they are commonly perceived as such.)
What do you think it is that makes an immigrant population assimilable? I ask because you haven't really defined what makes Poles more assimilable than say Chinese, or Syrians, or Kenyans. Are there any factors apart from colour that would help an immigrant to tick the assimilation boxes?
The nature of whites: essentially how closely related to us they are and how culturally similar. Irish closer than Dutch, Dutch closer than Poles, Poles closer than Greeks, Greeks closer than Persians.
There's just no need for significant levels of immigration. Before 97 it was averaging around 50k per year, and before WW2 there was hardly any. The years since 97 have seen appalling declines in the state of the UK, though I'm fortunate to live in a village which is 98% white, with the non-whites mainly being mixed race: white mother and black father who has, what a surprise, buggered-off. So almost everybody has a white mother and the accompanying grandparents, uncles, aunties and cousins and almost all of the males have unmutilated penises.
The Roma: they're a big problem if they live near you and by far the least achieving immigrants from Europe: a few years ago Pakistanis in Sheffield complained to the local council about the backwardness of their new Roma neighbours who, for example, didn't use council-supplied rubbish bins but just chucked their rubbish into the street or their neighbours gardens.
Based on skin tone they're white, most of them much paler than, for example, Jeff Goldblum, though I'm aware that a lot of their ancestors came from the Indian sub-continent.
“It is therefore a product of Western culture, specifically its political institutions. Crucial to that point is the fact that there are no external forces in operation propelling a Great Replacement, other than the political institutions of the West which are products of Western culture”.
It is precisely the political institutions through their actions that have orchestrated the fall of the west. The political institutions which have and are engineered by EXTERNAL forces.
Every institution you list in the footnote is created/backed/controlled by your pay masters. It’s so glaringly obvious that it’s actually surprising.
Who are the paymasters? Surely they are the people who own the money supply and control the wealth? If you answer that question correctly, it leads straight back to global financial capital. There is *no institution more Western than that one*. So who are the paymasters in your opinion?
The central banks are owned by a cartel of the most powerful banks. All the most powerful financial institutions, including the banks, are incestuously intertwined. Ian Carroll did a good presentation on that on X which confirmed what I suspected. So Blackrock, Vanguard, Statestreet and 7/8 others own about 60-80% of every major listed corporation, including the banks.
The question that I don't have the answer to is: who are the individual owners behind those top 10 financial institutions and banks? If you have a list of the individuals and families that own those institutions and effectively own the central banks, please share, with evidence, so I can write the most important article I will have ever written.
Great article. So sad, that so many people are falling for this.
The ruling class have played a blinder once again.
I think most objective 'conspiracy theorists' would agree that the ruling can engineer and exploit immigration for economic reasons and to create new opportunities for divide-and-conquer operations.
However, I have never been given a logical reason as to why the ruling class would show preference for slaves of a particular ethnicity or religion. Furthermore, they revealed their intention of wanting to change the very essence of what it is to be human through their twisted Transhumanist ideology. Is there any evidence to suggest that a Syrian would be a better candidate than a Scotsman, or have superior substance, for this inorganic redesign?
Various quotes and writings through the years suggest that the parasite class see us all as farm animals or Untermensch.
Is European/American/British culture under attack? Yes. Is this attack confined to White Christians? No. Technocracy will affect aspect of our lives from our person-to-person interactions, consumption habits, our relationship with the natural world and therefore will ‘re-image’ all culture if these Sickos are successful.
in the last decade, Trudeau added 10 million immigrants into a country of 30 million. The Great Replacement is a daily, on the ground reality that no amount of gaslighting, be it ever so verbose, can change.
Fair enough. Genuine question - would you be calling it a Great Replacement if the 10 million immigrants were all white?
Why do you think? Clue's in the name.
Why is it so hard to answer a simple question?
Depends on the nature of the whites.
I'm in England so can't comment on Canada, but I don't regard recent Polish immigration as part of the policy of population replacement, because they're so easily assimilated. We already knew this from our experience of the Poles who decided to remain in the UK after WW2. That just left us with people whose surnames were hard to spell and pronounce but who were otherwise pretty much indistinguishable from the indigenous population.
The Roma, on the other hand,......
What do you mean by "the nature of the whites"? Am I to infer from your opening remark that you prefer immigration to be white but there are some types of white that you don't regard as desirable? I wasn't aware that there was a massive Roma immigration issue, so it seems a strange one to throw in. Do you consider Roma people to be white? (I don't think they are commonly perceived as such.)
What do you think it is that makes an immigrant population assimilable? I ask because you haven't really defined what makes Poles more assimilable than say Chinese, or Syrians, or Kenyans. Are there any factors apart from colour that would help an immigrant to tick the assimilation boxes?
The nature of whites: essentially how closely related to us they are and how culturally similar. Irish closer than Dutch, Dutch closer than Poles, Poles closer than Greeks, Greeks closer than Persians.
There's just no need for significant levels of immigration. Before 97 it was averaging around 50k per year, and before WW2 there was hardly any. The years since 97 have seen appalling declines in the state of the UK, though I'm fortunate to live in a village which is 98% white, with the non-whites mainly being mixed race: white mother and black father who has, what a surprise, buggered-off. So almost everybody has a white mother and the accompanying grandparents, uncles, aunties and cousins and almost all of the males have unmutilated penises.
The Roma: they're a big problem if they live near you and by far the least achieving immigrants from Europe: a few years ago Pakistanis in Sheffield complained to the local council about the backwardness of their new Roma neighbours who, for example, didn't use council-supplied rubbish bins but just chucked their rubbish into the street or their neighbours gardens.
Based on skin tone they're white, most of them much paler than, for example, Jeff Goldblum, though I'm aware that a lot of their ancestors came from the Indian sub-continent.
Statistics on the proportion of males who are circumsized are available : they reflect very badly on the people of the USA.
And any male who plays sport knows which of their teammates had loving parents and which didn't.
If that's the best that you can do you're probably looking forward to your next booster.
“It is therefore a product of Western culture, specifically its political institutions. Crucial to that point is the fact that there are no external forces in operation propelling a Great Replacement, other than the political institutions of the West which are products of Western culture”.
It is precisely the political institutions through their actions that have orchestrated the fall of the west. The political institutions which have and are engineered by EXTERNAL forces.
Every institution you list in the footnote is created/backed/controlled by your pay masters. It’s so glaringly obvious that it’s actually surprising.
Who are the paymasters? Surely they are the people who own the money supply and control the wealth? If you answer that question correctly, it leads straight back to global financial capital. There is *no institution more Western than that one*. So who are the paymasters in your opinion?
Yes they are the people that own the money supply.
Who owns the money supply?
Would you answer who owns the central banks?
The central banks are owned by a cartel of the most powerful banks. All the most powerful financial institutions, including the banks, are incestuously intertwined. Ian Carroll did a good presentation on that on X which confirmed what I suspected. So Blackrock, Vanguard, Statestreet and 7/8 others own about 60-80% of every major listed corporation, including the banks.
The question that I don't have the answer to is: who are the individual owners behind those top 10 financial institutions and banks? If you have a list of the individuals and families that own those institutions and effectively own the central banks, please share, with evidence, so I can write the most important article I will have ever written.
Google “what family started the central banks”.