14 Comments
User's avatar
Rob (c137)'s avatar

Even if fluoride worked for teeth (it doesn't, it causes fluorosis), it's in toothpaste.

Putting it in water is ridiculous. How much of that "beneficial" fluoride would get to the teeth? Very little. In fact, it would be financially stupid. So, because they want to waste money on this, it's obviously a scam.

The industries that have waste fluoride make money from this. The dentists have more business because it makes teeth more brittle.

The government likes that it lowers IQ, which is clear as day and the same reason why the Nazis promoted it.

Any time the government wants to "enhance" your life for "free", it's usually for someone's benefit at the expense of the people who end up paying for it with higher bills and health issues.

Expand full comment
Jessica Funk's avatar

This is the first piece of yours I have read, by way of a cross post. Excellent job! I am a dentist who awoke during COVID and I have spent the last four years combing through the lies I have learned through my education. Fluoride is top of my rabbit hole decline into the corruption of science and research at the expense of our health.

A patient of mine recently asked to discuss my fluoride position. He works for the town in which I practice. I was optimistic that he would understand the weight of the research that I have done to make a 180 of my professional opinion on fluoride. I used the example of ‘why don’t we put Vitamin D in the water’ if we’re in the business of medicating?? He had no response and it drives home not only the message of bodily autonomy but also the message that if it IS a medication then how the heck to you control how much each person consumes?? Seriously!

The saddest part about waking up is realizing how dumb some of the smartest people really are. They can have all the titles, all the years of school but can’t think their way out of a box!

I look forward to reading your other article on fluoride!

Expand full comment
Rusere Shoniwa's avatar

Heartening to see a dentist giving fluoride both barrels. We need more like you! Hope you enjoy the other piece!

Expand full comment
Jessica Funk's avatar

Many dentist reject the notion of coming out against fluoride because of how it affects our bottom line. If patients are concerned about fluoride in the water they may decline fluoride treatments. Fluoride treatments are the ‘vaccines’ of the dental profession….no science, toxic, a minute to dispense and top dollar for the treatment.

Expand full comment
F....'s avatar

''....If members of the public reading this piece know that fluoride is a toxin, is it rational to assume that your Oxbridge-educated ministers are all clueless? So you have to ask yourself: what on earth is motivating them?....''

The steps to government house are frequently used as steppingstones towards corporate appointments.

However then there are trade agreements which have provisions in them that enable a corporation to challenge a government in a closed and private tribunal when an existing law [or health regulation] stand in the way of a corporations own and imagined financial forecast.

Do I have to explain that they use their own officials - damages are awarded using taxpayers funds and there's no appeal process.

Expand full comment
Fast Eddy's avatar

It's a farm and we are the barnyard animals...

The farmers don't want everyone living to 100 cuz that is not a productive business model and the farm would collapse...

So they do things like stuff us with sugar... and vaccines ... to ruin our health ensuring we don't linger too long... the purpose of fluoride is likely related to reducing our cognitive abilities and keeping us compliant...

And the Covid Vaccines are about this https://fasteddynz.substack.com/p/the-ultimate-extinction-plan-uep

Expand full comment
F....'s avatar

The Plandemic was about a lot of things - none of them were related to safeguarding our health.

It was very good for the financial elite and the introduction of numerous agenda's such as the digital ID to the sovereignty shredding ''agreement'' with the WHO - that and much more.

Why did both Russia and China go along with it? - They need not have since Sars Cov 2 has never ever been proven to exist but they played along alright.

The plandemic revealed how easily many people was misled not least how quickly insecurity staff found and released their inner Nazi.

Expand full comment
Fast Eddy's avatar

But we ARE steaming oil out of sand... sounds like desperation... any idea why?

Expand full comment
Prof. Fred Nazar's avatar

Open season for human culling:

Why is food poisoning legal?

How Rumsfeld forced the approval of Aspartame.

Artificial sweeteners, MSG, PFAS, Glyphosate ... go organic!

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/why-is-food-poisoning-legal

War on food

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/war-on-food

Bill Gates, raunchy rancher

The plan? slo-poison us!

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/bill-gates-raunchy-rancher

Water poisoning

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/water-poisoning-they-drink-perrier

Not fast food, PFAS food:

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/fast-food-or-pfas-food

War on poultry and cattle:

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/war-on-poultry

War on Pigs

No ham, bacon, sausages, pork ribs, chops and tenderloin

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/war-on-pigs

Expand full comment
Michael Ginsburg's avatar

Same as the Fluoride Fascists in Australia...

Expand full comment
Steve Jack's avatar

Thanks for this article, Rusere. I read the previous one you wrote on the subject and it pretty much blew my mind. It also prompted me to find out more about this and to get involved with a local campaigning group here in Cumbria (West Cumbria is now having their water supply fluoridated).

At a well-attended public meeting they organised in Cockermouth, I also met Joy Warren, an absolute one-woman powerhouse and font of knowledge on this issue (spokesperson for FFAUK - Fluoride Free Alliance UK). Since then I've been helping Joy and others campaign around the ongoing Public Consultation on water Fluoridation in the north-east of England.

It would help all of these causes / campaigns if we get a positive judgement in the ongoing case in the US (a decision is due any time now), but my thanks in any case for helping to bring this extraordinary injustice and insidious programme to light. The backstory alone (involving the Manhattan Project and goodness knows what else) is riveting in itself.

Expand full comment
Rusere Shoniwa's avatar

Many thanks Steve and brilliant news on the activism.

Expand full comment
Stephen Walker's avatar

JR Bruning has written some articles related to this.

https://open.substack.com/pub/jrbruning/p/wow-nz-never-did-a-meta-analysis

Expand full comment
george tzindaro's avatar

All very true and I agree 100%! But hardly anyone actually drinks tap water except small children. Most people drink bottled water if they drink water at all, although tap water does get used in tea and coffee.

And only people who live in homes with public water supply are affected by anything in the public water supply. People who live in rural areas usually have their own well or filtered water from a running stream. And anyone still living in a city with only public water mains after the covid shlimbeserung is already brain damaged or they would have moved out by now.

The only advice on how to deal with thiis kind of situation is, leane town, move to as remote a place as you can find, and drill your own well, live next to a running natural stream from which you can obtain and filter water, or, if the local climate supplies it, collect rainwater. Public water supplies are bound to be contaminated anyway, quite aside from floride. The clorrine used to disinfect them is also a toxin.

Expand full comment